12861: Re: 12858: stanley honorat re:12815 dorce's response (fwd)

[Bob Corbett <corbetre@webster.edu>]

From: rudy barthelemy <kreyolconnection@yahoo.com>

Mr. Honorat wrote:
> i personally feel that it is more important to worry
> about aristide's
> character (or lack thereof).  garrison is a man who
> chose to state his
> opinions and his version of events in a way that
> suited him (VOODOO
> POLITICS) and is entitled to do so.  whether one
> agrees with those opinion
> or not is a matter of choice.  aristide, however is
> in the process of
> destroying a country.  that is alarming, to say the
> least.

Without knowing Mr.Honorat at all, I find his comments
very amusing.  According to him, it's more important
to worry about Aristide's character because he "is in
the process of destroying a country" and it's not that
important to worry about Garrison's because this
latter one "is stating his opinions and his version of
events in a way that suited him, and he's entitled to
to do so."   What if all this was the other way
around?

Le monde à l'envers!
Reality under rape!
History in the unmaking!

Roody

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Finance - Get real-time stock quotes
http://finance.yahoo.com