17938: Reid: Haiti rewarded with control over own internet domain name (fwd)

[Bob Corbett <corbetre@webster.edu>]

From: Ralph Reid <rafreid@yahoo.com>

Haiti kisses ICANN ring, rewarded with control over own domain
By Kieren McCarthy
Posted: 14/01/2004 at 21:52 GMT
Get The Reg wherever you are, with The Mobile Register

In Geneva recently, the world’s governments got together in the first
ever meeting dedicated to discussing the effect of the Internet on the
world.

It very nearly fell apart after a huge split over who should be running
the Net - the semi-autonomous private Californian company still
beholden to the US government, ICANN, or the international standards
body responsible for telecommunications across the globe, ITU.

The arguments were complex and the issue cleverly put on the
backburner. But if there is one point that the committee set up to
debate the issue and report back next year ought to focus on it is the
issue of the redelegation of country code top-level domains.

This issue - where the overall control of all the domains for a
particular country (like .uk for Great Britain or .de for Germany) is
given to a completely different entity - is really a microcosm of what
is happening across the entire Internet and raises points that simply
cannot be ignored. And as luck would have it, another one has just
popped up.

Enter Haiti

Control over the entire .ht domain, representing the Caribbean island
of Haiti, is to be given to the government-supported consortium
FDS/RDDH. The existing owner, Hintelfocus, is said to be happy with
this arrangement. And so it shall be done.

On the surface, there is nothing wrong with this. In the early days of
the Internet, few people had the know-how to run a country's registry
so control of them was handed out by Jon Postel personally to
individuals he felt could be trusted to do a good job. It was
inevitable that as the Net grew, these individuals would be replaced by
big companies and that the country's government would take a great
interest in who was running its domain names.

In fact, it is reasonable to assume that a government would have final
say over who ran its domain names. They do represent the country and
the government are the people that run the country. ICANN agrees. "In
general." This is what the private company based in California reckons
about the world having control of its own domains: "In general, [we]
recognize that each government has the ultimate responsibility within
its territory for its national public-policy objectives, but also that
ICANN has the responsibility for ensuring that the Internet domain name
system continues to provide an effective and interoperable global
naming system."

The longer or shorter of it is that countries have been held to ransom
by ICANN over their own domain names until they agree to ICANN's terms.
And those terms are always that the government swears loyalty to ICANN.
And signs a contract to that effect.

The Haiti government indicated back in May 2002 that it wanted FDS/RDDH
to take over its .ht domain. Yet it has taken nearly two years for this
to happen. The redelegation of the .af domain for Afghanistan took just
three weeks. Three weeks after the US had invaded and taken over the
country.

Why the discrepancy? Almost certainly because the Haiti government
refused to agree to ICANN's terms. But once it realised that ICANN can
stall any redelegation forever and that ICANN was almost certainly
going to survive as Internet overseer, it had no choice but to
acquiesce.

__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Hotjobs: Enter the "Signing Bonus" Sweepstakes
http://hotjobs.sweepstakes.yahoo.com/signingbonus